Tagewerk VI
Tier-1 counterexample-certificate domain — self-ordered sequences + n-absorbing ideals
A reusable certify(object) interface over the finite/exact-decidable open-problem counterexamples — a sibling of the process-complexity and code-bound certificate domains. This cycle publishes the two new Tier-1 families (monomial-normality (4,5,7) is Cycle 5). self_ordered (Cahen–Fontana–Frisch–Glaz Problem 16, Chabert): the sequence {n^3} is NOT self-ordered — an explicit witness at (m,n)=(3,2), where D_2 = 56 does not divide the corresponding product 702 — while the triangular numbers and the powers of two are certified self-ordered up to a bound. n_absorbing (Problem 30, Anderson–Badawi): the absorbing number of the zero ideal in Z/m, absorbingNumber(⊥ : Z/4) = 2 and absorbingNumber(⊥ : Z/9) = 2, each a decide over Fin(k+1) → ZMod m. Every certificate is kernel-decided with only the standard axioms (or none), names the fact it attests, and downloads verbatim (verify the SHA-256).
Verdicts — machine-adjudicated (4)
- REFUTED SO-cube {n^3} is not self-ordered (Problem 16)
Witness (m,n)=(3,2): D_2 = (a_2-a_0)(a_2-a_1) = 8·7 = 56 does not divide (a_3-a_0)(a_3-a_1) = 27·26 = 702 (702 mod 56 = 30). Kernel-decided.
- CERTIFIED SO-base triangular {n(n+1)/2} and {2^n} are self-ordered (up to bound)
Bounded positive certificate: for all m,n < 6 the divisibility holds; a base-family witness of self-ordering. Kernel-decided.
- CERTIFIED NAbs-4 absorbingNumber(⊥ : Z/4) = 2
⊥ is 2-absorbing but not 1-absorbing in Z/4, decided over all functions Fin 3 → ZMod 4. Axiom-free.
- CERTIFIED NAbs-9 absorbingNumber(⊥ : Z/9) = 2
⊥ is 2-absorbing but not 1-absorbing in Z/9 = Z/3². Axiom-free.
Re-runnable artifacts
- counterexample_domain_certs.lean ↓ sha256 f7f8b260ec7f…
Files download verbatim from this site — the exact kernel-checked bytes (verify the SHA-256). See how to re-verify.
Repositories — the code trail
- produced elementalcollision/leibniz-daemon #282 scripts/counterexample_domain.py + docs/crt/counterexample_domain_certs.lean
References
- Cahen, P.-J., Fontana, M., Frisch, S., & Glaz, S. (2014). Open problems in commutative ring theory. In M. Fontana, S. Frisch, & S. Glaz (Eds.), Commutative algebra (pp. 353–375). Springer.
- Adam, D., Cahen, P.-J., & Fares, Y. (2010). Subsets of ℤ with simultaneous ordering. Integers, 10, 437–451.
- Anderson, D. F., & Badawi, A. (2011). On n-absorbing ideals of commutative rings. Communications in Algebra, 39(5), 1646–1672.